Triple
T1144427
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Swedish Regency Council |
E23530
|
entity |
| Predicate | exercisedPower |
P23177
|
FINISHED |
| Object | executive authority in Sweden |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: executive authority in Sweden | Statement: [Swedish Regency Council, exercisedPower, executive authority in Sweden]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: exercisedPower Context triple: [Swedish Regency Council, exercisedPower, executive authority in Sweden]
-
A.
exercisedPowerOver
Indicates that one entity exerted control, influence, or authority over another entity.
-
B.
exerciseOfPower
Indicates the exertion or application of authority, control, or influence by one entity over another or within a given context.
-
C.
hadExecutivePowerIn
chosen
Indicates that an entity held executive authority or governing power within a specified organization, institution, or jurisdiction during a certain period.
-
D.
powers
Indicates that one entity supplies or provides the energy, authority, or driving force that enables another entity to function or operate.
-
E.
retainedExecutivePowerFor
Indicates that an entity has kept or reserved executive authority or decision-making power for another entity or context, rather than delegating or relinquishing it.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a493ef399c8190b04b9146d2314f59 |
completed | March 1, 2026, 7:30 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a4bc5008d8819095c1ffb5db5b4911 |
completed | March 1, 2026, 10:23 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a4bb4d4104819084027a043c6118cb |
completed | March 1, 2026, 10:18 p.m. |
Created at: March 1, 2026, 7:44 p.m.