Triple
T1144059
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | XAMS |
E23522
|
entity |
| Predicate | associatedWithCurrency |
P11731
|
FINISHED |
| Object | euro |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: euro | Statement: [XAMS, associatedWithCurrency, euro]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: associatedWithCurrency Context triple: [XAMS, associatedWithCurrency, euro]
-
A.
associatedCurrencyCode
Indicates the currency code that is linked to or used in connection with the given entity or transaction.
-
B.
linkedByCurrencyArrangementWith
Indicates that two entities are connected through a formal currency-related arrangement, such as a peg, union, swap line, or other structured monetary linkage.
-
C.
involvesCurrency
Indicates that the relationship or action includes or pertains to the use, exchange, or specification of a particular currency.
-
D.
usesCurrency
Indicates that one entity conducts its financial transactions or values using the monetary unit represented by the other entity.
-
E.
currencyType
chosen
Indicates the specific kind of monetary unit or currency associated with an entity or transaction.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a493ef399c8190b04b9146d2314f59 |
completed | March 1, 2026, 7:30 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a4bc5008d8819095c1ffb5db5b4911 |
completed | March 1, 2026, 10:23 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a4bb4d4104819084027a043c6118cb |
completed | March 1, 2026, 10:18 p.m. |
Created at: March 1, 2026, 7:44 p.m.