Triple
T11429560
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Neanderthals |
E270842
|
entity |
| Predicate | usedPigments |
P39511
|
FINISHED |
| Object | ochre in some contexts |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: ochre in some contexts | Statement: [Neanderthals, usedPigments, ochre in some contexts]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: usedPigments Context triple: [Neanderthals, usedPigments, ochre in some contexts]
-
A.
usesDyes
chosen
Indicates that one entity employs or applies dyes in relation to another entity or process.
-
B.
usedInBlends
Indicates that something serves as an ingredient or component within one or more mixtures, combinations, or blends.
-
C.
eraUsedIn
Indicates that something (such as a method, standard, or practice) was in active use during a specified historical or temporal era.
-
D.
secondaryPigment
Indicates that one pigment functions as a secondary or supporting color relative to another primary pigment in a given context.
-
E.
materialUsed
Indicates that one entity is made from, incorporates, or utilizes the other entity as its material or substance.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d6aadeef688190874bcecd88b3dd9b |
completed | April 8, 2026, 7:22 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69d806c1bfb881909720c74fe0fa837f |
completed | April 9, 2026, 8:06 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69d7e71436f88190ac7e45a04ea5c987 |
completed | April 9, 2026, 5:51 p.m. |
Created at: April 8, 2026, 9:35 p.m.