Triple

T11413332
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Province of Foggia E270426 entity
Predicate contains P35 FINISHED
Object Cerignola E488120 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Cerignola | Statement: [Province of Foggia, contains, Cerignola]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Cerignola
Context triple: [Province of Foggia, contains, Cerignola]
  • A. Cerignola chosen
    Cerignola is a large agricultural and industrial town in Italy’s Apulia region, known especially for its olive production and location in the fertile Tavoliere plain.
  • B. Gioia del Colle
    Gioia del Colle is a historic town in the Apulia region of southern Italy, known for its medieval castle, wine production, and strategic location between Bari and Taranto.
  • C. Nardò
    Nardò is a historic town in Italy’s Apulia region, known for its Baroque architecture and location in the province of Lecce in the Salento area.
  • D. Barletta
    Barletta is a historic coastal city in the Apulia region of southern Italy, known for its medieval architecture and role as a provincial capital.
  • E. Ceccano
    Ceccano is a historic town and comune in the Lazio region of central Italy, situated in the Province of Frosinone along the Sacco River.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d6aaddeaa8819088b30ef7b50598c9 completed April 8, 2026, 7:22 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69d801acd9bc81908a23b1b7b4e778d3 completed April 9, 2026, 7:44 p.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_69e6e7580c508190a81eadd9015c75ef completed April 21, 2026, 2:56 a.m.
Created at: April 8, 2026, 9:34 p.m.