Triple
T11409270
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | iPhone 14 Pro |
E270323
|
entity |
| Predicate | supportsMagSafe |
P85053
|
FINISHED |
| Object | true |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: true | Statement: [iPhone 14 Pro, supportsMagSafe, true]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: supportsMagSafe Context triple: [iPhone 14 Pro, supportsMagSafe, true]
-
A.
hasMagSafePort
Indicates that one entity is equipped with or includes a MagSafe charging or power connector port.
-
B.
magSafeVersion
chosen
Indicates the specific MagSafe standard or iteration associated with a device or accessory.
-
C.
supportsWirelessCharging
Indicates that one entity provides the capability for another entity to be charged without a physical wired connection, typically via inductive or similar wireless power transfer methods.
-
D.
usesMagnetType
Indicates that one entity employs or operates with a specific type of magnet in its function or configuration.
-
E.
wirelessChargingStandard
Indicates that one entity specifies or supports the particular wireless charging protocol or standard used by another entity.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d6aaddeaa8819088b30ef7b50598c9 |
completed | April 8, 2026, 7:22 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69d8014e72748190a01bde2f0105cedb |
completed | April 9, 2026, 7:43 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69d7e70ffd708190b62a78ebcbce9f78 |
completed | April 9, 2026, 5:51 p.m. |
Created at: April 8, 2026, 9:34 p.m.