Triple
T11408914
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Theodoros |
E270313
|
entity |
| Predicate | derivedFromLexeme |
P99154
|
FINISHED |
| Object | θεός (god) |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: θεός (god) | Statement: [Theodoros, derivedFromLexeme, θεός (god)]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: derivedFromLexeme Context triple: [Theodoros, derivedFromLexeme, θεός (god)]
-
A.
derivedFrom
Indicates that one entity originates, is obtained, or is developed from another source entity.
-
B.
derivedBy
Indicates that one entity is obtained, produced, or inferred from another through some transformation, process, or reasoning.
-
C.
hasLexicalReconstruction
Indicates that there exists a hypothesized or reconstructed lexical form corresponding to a word or expression, typically inferred for an earlier or unattested stage of a language.
-
D.
hasLexicalInfluenceOn
Indicates that one linguistic element (such as a word, phrase, or lexicon) has affected or shaped the form, usage, or meaning of another linguistic element.
-
E.
hasLexicalReconstructionDomain
Indicates that something belongs to or is associated with a particular domain or scope within which its lexical reconstruction is defined or applicable.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d6aaddeaa8819088b30ef7b50598c9 |
completed | April 8, 2026, 7:22 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69d8014e72748190a01bde2f0105cedb |
completed | April 9, 2026, 7:43 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69d7e70ffd708190b62a78ebcbce9f78 |
completed | April 9, 2026, 5:51 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69d80010712c819089ea2e31e664abe1 |
completed | April 9, 2026, 7:37 p.m. |
Created at: April 8, 2026, 9:34 p.m.