Triple

T11393078
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject White Court E269894 entity
Predicate significantCase P4528 FINISHED
Object Hammer v. Dagenhart E64581 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Hammer v. Dagenhart | Statement: [White Court, significantCase, Hammer v. Dagenhart]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07 
Target entity: Hammer v. Dagenhart
Context triple: [White Court, significantCase, Hammer v. Dagenhart]
  • A. Hammer v. Dagenhart chosen
    Hammer v. Dagenhart was a 1918 U.S. Supreme Court decision that struck down federal child labor regulations under the Commerce Clause, later repudiated as a symbol of restrictive interpretations of federal power.
  • B. Lochner v. New York
    Lochner v. New York is a landmark 1905 U.S. Supreme Court decision that struck down a state labor regulation and became emblematic of the era in which the Court used substantive due process to protect economic liberty and limit government regulation of business.
  • C. United States v. E. C. Knight Co.
    United States v. E. C. Knight Co. was an 1895 U.S. Supreme Court decision that sharply limited the federal government’s power to regulate monopolies under the Commerce Clause, weakening early enforcement of the Sherman Antitrust Act.
  • D. Wickard v. Filburn
    Wickard v. Filburn is a landmark 1942 U.S. Supreme Court case that dramatically expanded federal regulatory power by holding that even purely local, non-commercial activity could be regulated under the Commerce Clause if it had a substantial effect on interstate commerce.
  • E. United States v. Butler
    United States v. Butler was a 1936 U.S. Supreme Court case that struck down key provisions of the New Deal’s Agricultural Adjustment Act as an unconstitutional use of federal taxing and spending power.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d6aacdbc6c8190af6dc3d5f5d22836 completed April 8, 2026, 7:21 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69d8001796f48190822526f52e3f0337 completed April 9, 2026, 7:37 p.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_69e58c8f5ed88190b9cc55c0a73993ec completed April 20, 2026, 2:16 a.m.
Created at: April 8, 2026, 9:34 p.m.