Triple

T11393034
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject The First Amendment did not bar prosecution of the defendant's antiwar publications under the circumstances of the case E269893 entity
Predicate relatedCase P3137 FINISHED
Object Frohwerk v. United States E55132 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Frohwerk v. United States | Statement: [The First Amendment did not bar prosecution of the defendant's antiwar publications under the circumstances of the case, relatedCase, Frohwerk v. United States]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07 
Target entity: Frohwerk v. United States
Context triple: [The First Amendment did not bar prosecution of the defendant's antiwar publications under the circumstances of the case, relatedCase, Frohwerk v. United States]
  • A. Frohwerk v. United States chosen
    Frohwerk v. United States is a 1919 U.S. Supreme Court case in which the Court upheld a conviction for antiwar newspaper articles, reinforcing broad federal power to punish speech deemed obstructive to World War I military recruitment.
  • B. Wright v. United States
    Wright v. United States is a 1938 U.S. Supreme Court case that clarified the scope of presidential veto power and the constitutional requirements for lawmaking under the Presentment Clause.
  • C. Abrams v. United States
    Abrams v. United States was a 1919 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld the conviction of antiwar activists under federal law and is best known for Justice Holmes’s famous dissent articulating the “marketplace of ideas” concept in free speech jurisprudence.
  • D. Carpenter v. United States
    Carpenter v. United States is a 2018 U.S. Supreme Court decision that held the government generally must obtain a warrant to access historical cell phone location records under the Fourth Amendment.
  • E. United States v. Darby
    United States v. Darby is a 1941 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld federal labor regulations under the Commerce Clause and marked a broad expansion of federal power over economic activity.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d6aacdbc6c8190af6dc3d5f5d22836 completed April 8, 2026, 7:21 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69d8001796f48190822526f52e3f0337 completed April 9, 2026, 7:37 p.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_69e603d2320c81909ed6946c7b7dfb36 completed April 20, 2026, 10:45 a.m.
Created at: April 8, 2026, 9:34 p.m.