Triple

T11385750
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Wile E. Coyote E269710 entity
Predicate sometimesSpeaks P99031 FINISHED
Object in a refined, formal manner LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: in a refined, formal manner | Statement: [Wile E. Coyote, sometimesSpeaks, in a refined, formal manner]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: sometimesSpeaks
Context triple: [Wile E. Coyote, sometimesSpeaks, in a refined, formal manner]
  • A. speaksWith
    Indicates that one entity engages in spoken communication or conversation with another entity.
  • B. oftenSays
    Indicates that one entity frequently makes a particular statement or remark, or regularly expresses a certain idea or phrase.
  • C. alsoSpeak
    Indicates that an entity, in addition to another language or mode of communication already mentioned, speaks this additional language or communicates in this additional way.
  • D. speaksIn
    Indicates that an entity uses or expresses itself in a particular language or medium when speaking.
  • E. maySpeak
    Indicates that one entity is permitted or allowed to speak to, or communicate verbally with, another entity.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d6aacdbc6c8190af6dc3d5f5d22836 completed April 8, 2026, 7:21 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69d800160a1c81909d115bf89fe54a49 completed April 9, 2026, 7:37 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69d7e70b228c8190b87f5101fd683788 completed April 9, 2026, 5:51 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69d80010712c819089ea2e31e664abe1 completed April 9, 2026, 7:37 p.m.
Created at: April 8, 2026, 9:34 p.m.