Triple

T1137449
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Cyrillic Extended-B E23171 entity
Predicate hasUnicodeProperty P26444 FINISHED
Object Script=Cyrillic LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Script=Cyrillic | Statement: [Cyrillic Extended-B, hasUnicodeProperty, Script=Cyrillic]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasUnicodeProperty
Context triple: [Cyrillic Extended-B, hasUnicodeProperty, Script=Cyrillic]
  • A. hasUnicode
    Indicates that an entity is associated with, represented by, or encoded using a specific Unicode character or sequence.
  • B. hasUnicodeName
    Indicates that an entity is associated with a specific official Unicode name assigned to a character or symbol.
  • C. hasUnicodeScript
    Indicates that a character or text element belongs to a specific Unicode script category (such as Latin, Cyrillic, or Han).
  • D. hasUnicodeStatus
    Indicates that a given entity has a particular Unicode-related classification or status (such as assigned, reserved, deprecated, or noncharacter) within the Unicode standard.
  • E. hasCombiningMarks
    Indicates that an entity (such as a character or string) includes one or more combining marks attached to a base element.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69a493ec75988190b63a11bafaec29b4 completed March 1, 2026, 7:30 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69a4bde18d208190848c189b2b8d585f completed March 1, 2026, 10:29 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69a4bb4b52d48190bec2e7ad1cc8efc0 completed March 1, 2026, 10:18 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69a4bddfa598819088690e1ab010ba0b completed March 1, 2026, 10:29 p.m.
Created at: March 1, 2026, 7:44 p.m.