Triple
T11372847
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Ross River |
E269384
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasTributary |
P415
|
FINISHED |
| Object |
Louisa Creek
Louisa Creek is a smaller watercourse in Queensland, Australia, that feeds into the Ross River within its catchment area.
|
E1141890
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (4 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Louisa Creek | Statement: [Ross River, hasTributary, Louisa Creek]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Louisa Creek Context triple: [Ross River, hasTributary, Louisa Creek]
-
A.
Ritchie Creek
Ritchie Creek is a smaller stream in San Diego County, California, that feeds into the San Diego River within its watershed.
-
B.
Banita Creek
Banita Creek is a small waterway running through Nacogdoches in East Texas, contributing to the local landscape and drainage system.
-
C.
Lodgepole Creek
Lodgepole Creek is a stream in northeastern Colorado that flows eastward through the High Plains before joining the Republican River system.
-
D.
Gilmore Creek
Gilmore Creek is a minor watercourse in New South Wales, Australia, that feeds into the Tumut River within the Murray–Darling Basin.
-
E.
Tarján Creek
Tarján Creek is a small watercourse originating in Hungary’s Mátra Mountains, contributing to the region’s local drainage and natural landscape.
- F. None of above. chosen
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NEDg
Description generation
gpt-5.1
Instruction
Generate a one-sentence description of the target entity. You are given a context triple in the form (subject, predicate, object), where the object is the target entity. # Instructions Use the triple to infer relevant information about the entity. Describe the entity based on what is most defining, well-known. Avoid repeating the information from the triple, unless really essential. # Response Format Return only the sentence: "Description: [one-sentence description of the target entity]"
Input
Entity: Louisa Creek Triple: [Ross River, hasTributary, Louisa Creek]
Generated description
Louisa Creek is a smaller watercourse in Queensland, Australia, that feeds into the Ross River within its catchment area.
NED2
Entity disambiguation (via description)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Louisa Creek Target entity description: Louisa Creek is a smaller watercourse in Queensland, Australia, that feeds into the Ross River within its catchment area.
-
A.
Ritchie Creek
Ritchie Creek is a smaller stream in San Diego County, California, that feeds into the San Diego River within its watershed.
-
B.
Banita Creek
Banita Creek is a small waterway running through Nacogdoches in East Texas, contributing to the local landscape and drainage system.
-
C.
Lodgepole Creek
Lodgepole Creek is a stream in northeastern Colorado that flows eastward through the High Plains before joining the Republican River system.
-
D.
Gilmore Creek
Gilmore Creek is a minor watercourse in New South Wales, Australia, that feeds into the Tumut River within the Murray–Darling Basin.
-
E.
Tarján Creek
Tarján Creek is a small watercourse originating in Hungary’s Mátra Mountains, contributing to the region’s local drainage and natural landscape.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (5 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d6aacca1048190b39dbbc2174616fa |
completed | April 8, 2026, 7:21 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69d7ea8d244c8190b865260338edb532 |
completed | April 9, 2026, 6:06 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69fec869957481909ea4fded01851b70 |
completed | May 9, 2026, 5:38 a.m. |
| NEDg | Description generation | batch_69feca4643dc8190af82f6c2f9133e2a |
completed | May 9, 2026, 5:46 a.m. |
| NED2 | Entity disambiguation (via description) | batch_69fecb0459008190888043ab25bae96b |
completed | May 9, 2026, 5:49 a.m. |
Created at: April 8, 2026, 9:33 p.m.