Triple
T11360094
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | dye-sensitized solar cell |
E269062
|
entity |
| Predicate | canUseElectrolyte |
P51044
|
FINISHED |
| Object | solid-state hole conductor |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: solid-state hole conductor | Statement: [dye-sensitized solar cell, canUseElectrolyte, solid-state hole conductor]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: canUseElectrolyte Context triple: [dye-sensitized solar cell, canUseElectrolyte, solid-state hole conductor]
-
A.
electrolyte
chosen
Indicates a relationship where a substance functions as an electrolyte for another entity, typically by enabling or supporting ionic conduction in that context.
-
B.
canUse
Indicates that one entity has the ability, permission, or suitability to make use of another entity or resource.
-
C.
canElect
Indicates that one entity has the authority or ability to choose another entity for a position, role, or office through an election process.
-
D.
hasElectrode
Indicates that one entity is equipped with, contains, or is associated with an electrode component.
-
E.
hasElectricCharge
Indicates that an entity possesses a nonzero electric charge as a physical property.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d6aacbe18081909e5fadb50082dd96 |
completed | April 8, 2026, 7:21 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69d800160a1c81909d115bf89fe54a49 |
completed | April 9, 2026, 7:37 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69d7e7022d508190996f9be0847c2b41 |
completed | April 9, 2026, 5:50 p.m. |
Created at: April 8, 2026, 9:33 p.m.