Triple
T11358508
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Danish Defence Agreement |
E269022
|
entity |
| Predicate | instanceOf |
P0
|
FINISHED |
| Object | multi-year political agreement |
C964
|
CONCEPT FINISHED |
How this triple was built (1 step)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
CD
Concept disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target class: multi-year political agreement Context triple: [Danish Defence Agreement, instanceOf, multi-year political agreement]
-
A.
political agreement
chosen
A political agreement is a negotiated understanding or formal accord between political actors or entities that defines shared commitments, terms, and responsibilities on specific issues or policies.
-
B.
intergovernmental consensus
Intergovernmental consensus is a collective agreement reached among multiple governments or states, typically through negotiation and compromise, that establishes a shared position or decision on a specific issue.
-
C.
medieval political agreement
A medieval political agreement is a formal or informal pact between rulers, nobles, or institutions that defines mutual obligations—such as protection, allegiance, tribute, or territorial control—within the feudal and dynastic power structures of the Middle Ages.
-
D.
coalition
A coalition is a temporary or long-term alliance of individuals, groups, or organizations that coordinate their resources and actions to achieve shared goals or exert collective influence.
-
E.
political-military alliance
A political-military alliance is a formal agreement between two or more states to coordinate their defense and foreign policies, often including mutual security guarantees and joint military planning.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (1 batch)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d6aacbe18081909e5fadb50082dd96 |
completed | April 8, 2026, 7:21 p.m. |
Created at: April 8, 2026, 9:33 p.m.