Triple

T11357085
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Orb E268982 entity
Predicate hasReligiousMeaning P92990 FINISHED
Object yes LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: yes | Statement: [Orb, hasReligiousMeaning, yes]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasReligiousMeaning
Context triple: [Orb, hasReligiousMeaning, yes]
  • A. heeftReligieuzeBetekenis chosen
    Indicates that something holds or conveys a religious meaning, significance, or symbolism in relation to a belief system or practice.
  • B. hasReligiousOrigin
    Indicates that something originates from, is derived from, or is fundamentally based on a religious tradition, belief system, or practice.
  • C. laterReligiousSignificance
    Indicates that the subject acquires or is recognized as having religious importance or sacred status at a time subsequent to the period or context initially under consideration.
  • D. hasReligiousTheme
    Indicates that something (such as a work, event, or object) centrally involves or expresses religious ideas, symbols, practices, or narratives.
  • E. hasReligiousSee
    Indicates that one entity serves as the ecclesiastical or religious jurisdiction/seat (see) of another entity.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d6aacbe18081909e5fadb50082dd96 completed April 8, 2026, 7:21 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69d80148e2048190a716b515d78efdd1 completed April 9, 2026, 7:43 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69d7e6f8aeb4819080476f16a69b2ee3 completed April 9, 2026, 5:50 p.m.
Created at: April 8, 2026, 9:33 p.m.