Triple
T11351916
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Avalanche |
E268856
|
entity |
| Predicate | ecosystemCategory |
P964
|
FINISHED |
| Object | DeFi |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: DeFi | Statement: [Avalanche, ecosystemCategory, DeFi]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: ecosystemCategory Context triple: [Avalanche, ecosystemCategory, DeFi]
-
A.
partOfEcosystem
Indicates that an entity functions as a component within a larger ecological system, contributing to and affected by its interactions and processes.
-
B.
ecosystemRepresentation
Indicates that one entity serves as a model, depiction, or abstraction of an ecosystem, capturing its components, structure, or dynamics.
-
C.
primaryEcosystem
chosen
Indicates the main type of ecosystem in which an entity predominantly exists or operates.
-
D.
ecoregion
Indicates that one entity is located within, associated with, or belongs to the same ecological region as another entity.
-
E.
hasEcology
Indicates that an entity has a particular ecological context, such as its habitat, environmental role, or interactions within an ecosystem.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d6aacbe18081909e5fadb50082dd96 |
completed | April 8, 2026, 7:21 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69d80148e2048190a716b515d78efdd1 |
completed | April 9, 2026, 7:43 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69d7e6f8aeb4819080476f16a69b2ee3 |
completed | April 9, 2026, 5:50 p.m. |
Created at: April 8, 2026, 9:33 p.m.