Triple
T11342830
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Mendelssohns "Phaedon" |
E268641
|
entity |
| Predicate | modeOfArgumentation |
P58674
|
FINISHED |
| Object | rational argument |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: rational argument | Statement: [Mendelssohns "Phaedon", modeOfArgumentation, rational argument]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: modeOfArgumentation Context triple: [Mendelssohns "Phaedon", modeOfArgumentation, rational argument]
-
A.
philosophicalArgumentType
chosen
Indicates that one entity is classified as a specific type or category of philosophical argument in relation to another.
-
B.
argumentOf
Indicates that one entity functions as an argument (participant or operand) in relation to another entity, such as a predicate, event, or expression.
-
C.
arguesThat
Indicates that one entity presents reasons or justification in support of a specific claim, position, or proposition held about another entity or topic.
-
D.
defenseArgument
Indicates that an entity presents or supports a line of reasoning intended to defend or justify another entity, often in a legal or argumentative context.
-
E.
usedInArgumentAbout
Indicates that something (such as a statement, example, or piece of evidence) is employed as part of the reasoning or support within a particular argument or debate.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d6aacb1f0881908c84a349fd1be047 |
completed | April 8, 2026, 7:21 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69d80148e2048190a716b515d78efdd1 |
completed | April 9, 2026, 7:43 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69d7e6f8aeb4819080476f16a69b2ee3 |
completed | April 9, 2026, 5:50 p.m. |
Created at: April 8, 2026, 9:33 p.m.