Triple

T11318594
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Superstar E268029 entity
Predicate hasRepriseOrMotifRelation P21698 FINISHED
Object title motif of Jesus Christ Superstar LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: title motif of Jesus Christ Superstar | Statement: [Superstar, hasRepriseOrMotifRelation, title motif of Jesus Christ Superstar]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasRepriseOrMotifRelation
Context triple: [Superstar, hasRepriseOrMotifRelation, title motif of Jesus Christ Superstar]
  • A. hasReprise chosen
    Indicates that an action, theme, or element is repeated or returns after its initial occurrence.
  • B. melodyReusedBy
    Indicates that a melody originally used in one work is later reused or incorporated in another work.
  • C. hasRelationToOtherMovements
    Indicates that something is connected, associated, or otherwise related to other movements in a meaningful way.
  • D. hasMusicalShiftFromPreviousWork
    Indicates that a work exhibits a notable change in musical style, approach, or characteristics compared to the creator’s immediately preceding work.
  • E. hasNotableMelodicSimilarityTo
    Indicates that one musical piece shares a clearly recognizable and significant similarity in melody with another.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d6aaca5c24819083db46a30d86cb34 completed April 8, 2026, 7:21 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69d7e9de875481908acfa56015d4b46f completed April 9, 2026, 6:03 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69d787ad575081908274280bf75d95fd completed April 9, 2026, 11:04 a.m.
Created at: April 8, 2026, 9:32 p.m.