Triple
T11303512
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Nyeri dialect |
E267655
|
entity |
| Predicate | instanceOf |
P0
|
FINISHED |
| Object | regional variety of Kikuyu language |
C29518
|
CONCEPT FINISHED |
How this triple was built (1 step)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
CD
Concept disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target class: regional variety of Kikuyu language Context triple: [Nyeri dialect, instanceOf, regional variety of Kikuyu language]
-
A.
Tepehua language variety
A Tepehua language variety is a specific regional or community-based form of the Tepehua language, distinguished by its own phonological, lexical, and grammatical features within the broader Totonacan language family.
-
B.
Yana language variety
Yana language variety refers to any of the related but distinct forms of the Yana language traditionally spoken by the Yana people of northern California, encompassing dialectal differences in phonology, vocabulary, and grammar.
-
C.
regional variety of the Javanese language
A regional variety of the Javanese language is a geographically distinct form of Javanese characterized by unique phonological, lexical, and sometimes grammatical features while remaining mutually intelligible with other Javanese varieties.
-
D.
regional variety of Fijian
A regional variety of Fijian is a localized form of the Fijian language characterized by distinct phonological, lexical, and sometimes grammatical features associated with a specific geographic area or community in Fiji.
-
E.
regional variety of the Sasak language
A regional variety of the Sasak language is a geographically and socially distinct form of Sasak characterized by systematic differences in pronunciation, vocabulary, and grammar from other Sasak varieties.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (1 batch)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d6aac993a08190a6f36445ebaf9a43 |
completed | April 8, 2026, 7:21 p.m. |
Created at: April 8, 2026, 9:32 p.m.