Triple
T11280497
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Cerdic of Wessex |
E267051
|
entity |
| Predicate | allegedAncestry |
P30356
|
FINISHED |
| Object | ancestor of later kings of Wessex |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: ancestor of later kings of Wessex | Statement: [Cerdic of Wessex, allegedAncestry, ancestor of later kings of Wessex]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: allegedAncestry Context triple: [Cerdic of Wessex, allegedAncestry, ancestor of later kings of Wessex]
-
A.
plaintiffAncestry
Indicates that one entity is the plaintiff and stands in an ancestral or lineage-based relationship to another entity.
-
B.
claimedDescentFrom
chosen
Indicates that one entity asserts or maintains that it is descended from, or originates genealogically from, another entity.
-
C.
laterDiscoveredAncestry
Indicates that one entity learned about or confirmed an ancestral relationship or lineage only after an initial point in time or prior understanding.
-
D.
ancestralStatus
Indicates that one entity holds a particular ancestral or lineage-based relationship or status in relation to another entity.
-
E.
ancestor
Indicates that one entity is a forebear of another in a lineage, occurring in an earlier generation and connected through one or more parent-child relationships.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d6aac8c2f48190ad0596f1f89f0470 |
completed | April 8, 2026, 7:21 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69d7e969b3448190940e2bd499d2d7de |
completed | April 9, 2026, 6:01 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69d787a240588190aa097298f951c915 |
completed | April 9, 2026, 11:04 a.m. |
Created at: April 8, 2026, 9:31 p.m.