Triple
T11267734
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Yên Phong District |
E266730
|
entity |
| Predicate | borders |
P224
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Hiệp Hòa District |
E266729
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Hiệp Hòa District | Statement: [Yên Phong District, borders, Hiệp Hòa District]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Hiệp Hòa District Context triple: [Yên Phong District, borders, Hiệp Hòa District]
-
A.
Hiệp Hòa District
chosen
Hiệp Hòa District is a rural administrative district in Bắc Giang Province, Vietnam, known for its agricultural economy and proximity to the capital region.
-
B.
Mê Linh District
Mê Linh District is a rural administrative district located on the outskirts of Hanoi, Vietnam, known for its agriculture and flower cultivation.
-
C.
Phúc Thọ District
Phúc Thọ District is a rural administrative district located on the outskirts of Hanoi, Vietnam.
-
D.
Đan Phượng District
Đan Phượng District is a rural administrative district located on the outskirts of Hanoi, Vietnam.
-
E.
Tân Lạc District
Tân Lạc District is a rural administrative district in Vietnam’s Hòa Bình Province, known for its mountainous terrain and ethnic minority communities.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d6aac8c2f48190ad0596f1f89f0470 |
completed | April 8, 2026, 7:21 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69d7e94f60d48190bc925c3cb88641a8 |
completed | April 9, 2026, 6 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69fcd082fe64819088a270f18190b172 |
completed | May 7, 2026, 5:48 p.m. |
Created at: April 8, 2026, 9:31 p.m.