Triple

Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).

Phrase: State of New Jersey v. Bruno Richard Hauptmann | Statement: [David T. Wilentz, caseProsecuted, State of New Jersey v. Bruno Richard Hauptmann]

Target entity: State of New Jersey v. Bruno Richard Hauptmann
Context triple: [David T. Wilentz, caseProsecuted, State of New Jersey v. Bruno Richard Hauptmann]

• A. Leopold and Loeb murder trial
  The Leopold and Loeb murder trial was a 1924 American criminal case in which famed defense attorney Clarence Darrow argued against the death penalty for two wealthy University of Chicago students who had committed a highly publicized "thrill killing" of a young boy.
• B. Bruno Richard Hauptmann chosen
  Bruno Richard Hauptmann was a German-born American carpenter who was convicted and executed in 1936 for the infamous kidnapping and murder of Charles Lindbergh’s infant son.
• C. Lindbergh kidnapping
  The Lindbergh kidnapping was the infamous 1932 abduction and murder of aviator Charles Lindbergh’s young son, a crime that gripped the United States and led to major changes in federal kidnapping laws.
• D. Katz v. United States
  Katz v. United States is a landmark 1967 Supreme Court case that redefined Fourth Amendment protections by establishing that the amendment safeguards people’s reasonable expectations of privacy, not just physical places.
• E. Wong Sun v. United States
  Wong Sun v. United States is a landmark 1963 U.S. Supreme Court case that refined the exclusionary rule by establishing the “fruit of the poisonous tree” doctrine and clarifying when evidence obtained after an illegal search or arrest must be suppressed.
• F. None of above.
• G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Target predicate: caseProsecuted
Context triple: [David T. Wilentz, caseProsecuted, State of New Jersey v. Bruno Richard Hauptmann]

• A. prosecuted
  Indicates that legal authorities have formally brought criminal charges against an entity and pursued a case against them in a court of law.
• B. courtReported
  Indicates that a court’s decision, proceedings, or judgment have been formally documented and made publicly available in a report or record.
• C. subjectOfProsecution
  Indicates that an entity is the target or focus of a legal prosecution or criminal proceeding initiated by an authority.
• D. counselForProsecution chosen
  Indicates that an entity serves as a legal representative or advisor acting on behalf of the prosecution in a legal proceeding.
• E. courtIssue
  Indicates that a court formally issues or hands down a legal document, order, ruling, or decision to the relevant parties.
• F. None of above.