Triple

T11219327
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Milnor number E265517 entity
Predicate forNonSingularPoint P97906 FINISHED
Object μ = 0 LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: μ = 0 | Statement: [Milnor number, forNonSingularPoint, μ = 0]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: forNonSingularPoint
Context triple: [Milnor number, forNonSingularPoint, μ = 0]
  • A. hasCoordinateSingularity
    Indicates that something possesses a point or region where its coordinate description becomes undefined or degenerate, even if the underlying object or space may remain well-behaved.
  • B. isNondegenerate
    Indicates that the object or structure has no trivial, collapsed, or singular cases and thus satisfies the required non-degeneracy conditions.
  • C. isNondegenerateOn
    Indicates that a structure, form, or mapping does not collapse information or lose rank when restricted to a specified domain or subset.
  • D. isNonzeroFor
    Indicates that a given value, function, or quantity is not equal to zero under specified conditions or for specified inputs.
  • E. nonDifferentiableAt
    Indicates that a function fails to have a well-defined derivative at a specific point.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d6aac59460819089b9848b27f57848 completed April 8, 2026, 7:21 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69d7e8eb84c48190b4f3bede254afde2 completed April 9, 2026, 5:59 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69d75cfbbb188190861efd5d94fe27da completed April 9, 2026, 8:02 a.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69d77062271c8190b63da714ab5beff9 completed April 9, 2026, 9:24 a.m.
Created at: April 8, 2026, 9:30 p.m.