Triple
T11215153
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Dehn algorithm |
E265416
|
entity |
| Predicate | concludesNonIdentityIf |
P39460
|
FINISHED |
| Object | reduced word is nonempty |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: reduced word is nonempty | Statement: [Dehn algorithm, concludesNonIdentityIf, reduced word is nonempty]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: concludesNonIdentityIf Context triple: [Dehn algorithm, concludesNonIdentityIf, reduced word is nonempty]
-
A.
canBeConcludedWith
Indicates that one situation, process, or sequence is able to be finished, resolved, or brought to an end by another specified action or condition.
-
B.
concludedBy
Indicates that an event, process, or state is brought to an end or finalized by a specific agent or entity.
-
C.
canConclude
chosen
Indicates that one entity is able to logically derive or reach a conclusion about another entity or situation.
-
D.
concludedWith
Indicates that an event, process, or interaction ended or was finalized by a specific outcome, action, or state.
-
E.
concludesWithSpecial
Indicates that an event, process, or sequence ends with a distinctive or exceptional element, condition, or outcome.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d6aac59460819089b9848b27f57848 |
completed | April 8, 2026, 7:21 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69d7e8e8eef48190932a85784ce15c86 |
completed | April 9, 2026, 5:59 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69d75cfbbb188190861efd5d94fe27da |
completed | April 9, 2026, 8:02 a.m. |
Created at: April 8, 2026, 9:30 p.m.