Triple

T11199757
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Sibyl’s cave E265007 entity
Predicate connectedWithMyth P9595 FINISHED
Object Aeneas’s descent to the underworld LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Aeneas’s descent to the underworld | Statement: [Sibyl’s cave, connectedWithMyth, Aeneas’s descent to the underworld]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: connectedWithMyth
Context triple: [Sibyl’s cave, connectedWithMyth, Aeneas’s descent to the underworld]
  • A. coreMyth
    Indicates that something constitutes a central, foundational myth within a belief system, narrative, or cultural tradition.
  • B. usesMythOf
    Indicates that one entity employs or invokes a myth or mythical narrative about another entity as part of its actions, explanations, or representations.
  • C. linkedToMythology chosen
    Indicates that something has a connection or association with a mythological tradition, figure, story, or theme.
  • D. settingOfMyth
    Indicates that a location or environment serves as the backdrop or context in which a particular myth takes place.
  • E. mythVariant
    Indicates that one mythological narrative is a version, retelling, or alternative form of another myth.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d6aa9eb9248190b20211772621b4bc completed April 8, 2026, 7:21 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69d7e8c1e9f88190b2b42326aba9d778 completed April 9, 2026, 5:58 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69d75cf83464819087529d47d025d313 completed April 9, 2026, 8:02 a.m.
Created at: April 8, 2026, 9:29 p.m.