Triple
T11199601
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Hera Lacinia |
E265003
|
entity |
| Predicate | cultImportance |
P428
|
FINISHED |
| Object | major regional cult in Magna Graecia |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: major regional cult in Magna Graecia | Statement: [Hera Lacinia, cultImportance, major regional cult in Magna Graecia]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: cultImportance Context triple: [Hera Lacinia, cultImportance, major regional cult in Magna Graecia]
-
A.
peakImportance
Indicates that something reaches or represents the highest level of importance within a given context or timeframe.
-
B.
politicalImportance
Indicates the degree to which something holds significance, influence, or priority within political processes, decisions, or power structures.
-
C.
reasonForSignificance
Indicates that one entity explains or justifies why another entity is important, notable, or significant.
-
D.
importantSaint
Indicates that the subject is recognized as a particularly significant or highly revered saint within a religious or spiritual tradition.
-
E.
significance
chosen
Indicates that one entity holds particular importance, influence, or meaningful impact in relation to another entity or context.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d6aa9eb9248190b20211772621b4bc |
completed | April 8, 2026, 7:21 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69d7e8c1e9f88190b2b42326aba9d778 |
completed | April 9, 2026, 5:58 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69d75cf83464819087529d47d025d313 |
completed | April 9, 2026, 8:02 a.m. |
Created at: April 8, 2026, 9:29 p.m.