Triple
T11195723
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Judith Weir |
E264915
|
entity |
| Predicate | appointedAsMasterOfTheQueensMusic |
P97797
|
FINISHED |
| Object | 2014 |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: 2014 | Statement: [Judith Weir, appointedAsMasterOfTheQueensMusic, 2014]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: appointedAsMasterOfTheQueensMusic Context triple: [Judith Weir, appointedAsMasterOfTheQueensMusic, 2014]
-
A.
chiefQueen
Indicates that one entity is the primary or highest-ranking queen in relation to another entity.
-
B.
royalMistressOf
Indicates that one person is the (typically unofficial) romantic or sexual partner of a royal figure, such as a king or prince.
-
C.
predecessorAsQueen
Indicates that one entity previously held the position of queen immediately before another entity.
-
D.
successorAsQueen
Indicates that one entity became queen directly after another, inheriting the queenship as her successor.
-
E.
hasNotableQueen
Indicates that an entity is associated with a queen who is particularly famous, historically significant, or otherwise notable.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d6aa9eb9248190b20211772621b4bc |
completed | April 8, 2026, 7:21 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69d7e8bf14e481908563b15790af4d20 |
completed | April 9, 2026, 5:58 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69d75cf4461c8190af84060f7db83211 |
completed | April 9, 2026, 8:01 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69d77062271c8190b63da714ab5beff9 |
completed | April 9, 2026, 9:24 a.m. |
Created at: April 8, 2026, 9:29 p.m.