Triple
T11192102
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Tom Price |
E264825
|
entity |
| Predicate | isPlannedTown |
P97765
|
FINISHED |
| Object | true |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: true | Statement: [Tom Price, isPlannedTown, true]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: isPlannedTown Context triple: [Tom Price, isPlannedTown, true]
-
A.
isPlannedCity
Indicates that a city has been deliberately designed and constructed according to a pre-established urban plan rather than developing organically over time.
-
B.
isPlannedTownComponentOf
Indicates that a planned town element (such as a district, facility, or infrastructure unit) is designed to be part of a larger planned town or urban development.
-
C.
locatedInPlannedTown
Indicates that an entity is situated within the boundaries of a town that has been deliberately planned or designed rather than having developed organically.
-
D.
hasPlannedCity
Indicates that an entity has a city that was deliberately designed and constructed according to a prearranged plan.
-
E.
townPlannedWith
Indicates that a town was designed, organized, or laid out in coordination with a particular plan, entity, or planning effort.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d6aa9eb9248190b20211772621b4bc |
completed | April 8, 2026, 7:21 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69d7e8be025481909d311b587418dfb2 |
completed | April 9, 2026, 5:58 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69d75cf4461c8190af84060f7db83211 |
completed | April 9, 2026, 8:01 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69d77062271c8190b63da714ab5beff9 |
completed | April 9, 2026, 9:24 a.m. |
Created at: April 8, 2026, 9:29 p.m.