Triple
T1119128
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Art Gallery of Ontario |
E11168
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasNotableCollection |
P426
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Group of Seven works |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Group of Seven works | Statement: [Art Gallery of Ontario, hasNotableCollection, Group of Seven works]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasNotableCollection Context triple: [Art Gallery of Ontario, hasNotableCollection, Group of Seven works]
-
A.
hasArtCollection
Indicates that an entity possesses, maintains, or is associated with a collection of artworks.
-
B.
hasCollection
chosen
Indicates that an entity possesses, maintains, or is associated with a set or group of related items treated as a collection.
-
C.
hasNotableMine
Indicates that an entity possesses or is associated with a mine considered significant or noteworthy in some context.
-
D.
hasNotableDeal
Indicates that an entity is involved in a significant or noteworthy agreement, contract, or transaction with another entity.
-
E.
hasNotableReference
Indicates that one entity makes a significant or noteworthy mention of, or allusion to, another entity.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a493252a648190ac48f8742474a5e8 |
completed | March 1, 2026, 7:27 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a4bc4bc21881909dcfe628f59f3e8c |
completed | March 1, 2026, 10:23 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a4bb4562f48190831e959f5f309956 |
completed | March 1, 2026, 10:18 p.m. |
Created at: March 1, 2026, 7:43 p.m.