Triple

T1118384
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Battle of Trafalgar E11152 entity
Predicate hasApproximateFrancoSpanishShipsOfTheLine P861 FINISHED
Object 33 LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: 33 | Statement: [Battle of Trafalgar, hasApproximateFrancoSpanishShipsOfTheLine, 33]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasApproximateFrancoSpanishShipsOfTheLine
Context triple: [Battle of Trafalgar, hasApproximateFrancoSpanishShipsOfTheLine, 33]
  • A. notableShip
    Indicates that there is a notable or significant ship associated with the subject entity.
  • B. navalFleet
    Indicates a relationship where multiple naval vessels are organized and operate together as a coordinated maritime military force.
  • C. navalVesselsAlliedApprox
    Indicates that two or more naval vessels are approximately allied, suggesting a cooperative or friendly relationship without specifying a precise or formal alliance.
  • D. fleetFlagshipOf
    Indicates that one entity serves as the primary or leading flagship of a particular fleet.
  • E. numberOfShipsInvolved chosen
    Indicates the total count of ships that participated or were involved in a specified event or situation.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69a493252a648190ac48f8742474a5e8 completed March 1, 2026, 7:27 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69a4bc4bc21881909dcfe628f59f3e8c completed March 1, 2026, 10:23 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69a4bb4562f48190831e959f5f309956 completed March 1, 2026, 10:18 p.m.
Created at: March 1, 2026, 7:43 p.m.