Triple
T11180990
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | 2000–01 NBA season |
E264535
|
entity |
| Predicate | 76ersRegularSeasonRecord |
P97714
|
FINISHED |
| Object | 56–26 |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: 56–26 | Statement: [2000–01 NBA season, 76ersRegularSeasonRecord, 56–26]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: 76ersRegularSeasonRecord Context triple: [2000–01 NBA season, 76ersRegularSeasonRecord, 56–26]
-
A.
spursRegularSeasonRecord
Indicates the overall win-loss record achieved by the Spurs during a specific regular NBA season.
-
B.
BullsRegularSeasonRecord
Indicates the relationship that specifies the Chicago Bulls’ win–loss record for a particular NBA regular season.
-
C.
DallasRegularSeasonRecord
Indicates the win-loss (and possibly tie) performance record of the Dallas team during a specific regular season.
-
D.
knicksRegularSeasonRecord
Indicates the relationship that specifies the New York Knicks’ win–loss record during a particular NBA regular season.
-
E.
regularSeasonRecord1967–68
Indicates the win-loss (and possibly tie) performance of a team during the 1967–68 regular season.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d6aa9dafac8190bd90d2c74f661aa7 |
completed | April 8, 2026, 7:21 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69d7e8a7f35481909f35feb94ef10e80 |
completed | April 9, 2026, 5:58 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69d75cf0e6e88190973694abe2990973 |
completed | April 9, 2026, 8:01 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69d77062271c8190b63da714ab5beff9 |
completed | April 9, 2026, 9:24 a.m. |
Created at: April 8, 2026, 9:29 p.m.