Triple
T11176464
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Pact of Zanjón |
E264424
|
entity |
| Predicate | typeOfReforms |
P98268
|
FINISHED |
| Object | administrative reforms |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: administrative reforms | Statement: [Pact of Zanjón, typeOfReforms, administrative reforms]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: typeOfReforms Context triple: [Pact of Zanjón, typeOfReforms, administrative reforms]
-
A.
reformsBy
Indicates that one entity initiates, implements, or is responsible for changes or improvements (reforms) affecting another entity.
-
B.
implementedReformsIn
Indicates that an entity (typically a person, organization, or government) carried out or put into effect specific reforms within a particular context, domain, or location.
-
C.
relatedReforms
Indicates that one reform is connected or associated with another reform, typically through shared goals, content, or impact.
-
D.
goalOfReforms
Indicates that a reform or set of reforms is undertaken with the aim or intended objective of achieving a particular outcome.
-
E.
subjectToReformBy
Indicates that an entity is undergoing or designated for changes, improvements, or restructuring carried out by another entity.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d6aa9dafac8190bd90d2c74f661aa7 |
completed | April 8, 2026, 7:21 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69d7e8987e1081909b28a0bdb866beae |
completed | April 9, 2026, 5:57 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69d75cf0e6e88190973694abe2990973 |
completed | April 9, 2026, 8:01 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69d7706116248190a87440bec3960884 |
completed | April 9, 2026, 9:24 a.m. |
Created at: April 8, 2026, 9:29 p.m.