Triple

T11170310
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Copenhagen criteria E264255 entity
Predicate legalCriteriaInclude P98238 FINISHED
Object ability to implement the acquis communautaire LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: ability to implement the acquis communautaire | Statement: [Copenhagen criteria, legalCriteriaInclude, ability to implement the acquis communautaire]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: legalCriteriaInclude
Context triple: [Copenhagen criteria, legalCriteriaInclude, ability to implement the acquis communautaire]
  • A. evaluationCriteriaInclude
    Indicates that certain criteria are part of, or explicitly included in, the set of standards used to evaluate something.
  • B. eligibilityCriteria
    Indicates the conditions or requirements that must be satisfied for an entity to qualify for or be considered eligible for something.
  • C. eligibleFrom
    Indicates that a subject becomes or is considered eligible starting from a specified point in time or condition.
  • D. eligibleOn
    Indicates the date or condition from which something qualifies to begin or be considered valid or applicable.
  • E. listingCriterion
    Indicates the rule or standard used to determine how items are selected, ordered, or displayed in a listing.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d6aa9dafac8190bd90d2c74f661aa7 completed April 8, 2026, 7:21 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69d7e8952e248190b0751669e8c960b7 completed April 9, 2026, 5:57 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69d75cf0e6e88190973694abe2990973 completed April 9, 2026, 8:01 a.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69d7706116248190a87440bec3960884 completed April 9, 2026, 9:24 a.m.
Created at: April 8, 2026, 9:29 p.m.