Triple

T11165890
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Lord Willoughby de Eresby E264157 entity
Predicate involvesPreservationOf P66838 FINISHED
Object historic estates LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: historic estates | Statement: [Lord Willoughby de Eresby, involvesPreservationOf, historic estates]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: involvesPreservationOf
Context triple: [Lord Willoughby de Eresby, involvesPreservationOf, historic estates]
  • A. aimsToPreserve
    Indicates an intention or effort by one entity to maintain, protect, or keep another entity in its current or desired state.
  • B. hasSubjectOfPreservation chosen
    Indicates that something is the specific focus or object being preserved or conserved within a preservation relationship.
  • C. preservationType
    Indicates the method or process by which something is preserved or kept from deterioration.
  • D. preservationPurpose
    Indicates that something exists, is created, or is maintained with the specific aim of preserving or safeguarding another entity or resource.
  • E. preservationFactor
    Indicates the degree to which something is protected, maintained, or kept intact over time, often moderating how much change, loss, or degradation occurs.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d6aa9ccddc8190868998c8b7beb060 completed April 8, 2026, 7:21 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69d7e887293081909830852000d533fa completed April 9, 2026, 5:57 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69d75cec26fc8190a5497d186306f935 completed April 9, 2026, 8:01 a.m.
Created at: April 8, 2026, 9:29 p.m.