Triple

T11164859
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject actinide series E264133 entity
Predicate hasTypicalOxidationStates P71482 FINISHED
Object +3 LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: +3 | Statement: [actinide series, hasTypicalOxidationStates, +3]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasTypicalOxidationStates
Context triple: [actinide series, hasTypicalOxidationStates, +3]
  • A. hasTypicalOxidationState chosen
    Indicates that an element or species is associated with a commonly observed or characteristic oxidation state under standard or typical conditions.
  • B. oxidationStates
    Indicates the specific oxidation numbers assigned to an element or atom within a chemical species, reflecting its electron loss or gain state in that context.
  • C. hasOtherPossibleOxidationState
    Indicates that an entity, typically a chemical species, can exist in at least one additional oxidation state beyond the one currently specified.
  • D. mostStableOxidationState
    Indicates the oxidation state in which an element most commonly or preferentially exists under standard or typical conditions.
  • E. predominantOxidationStateInSolution
    Indicates the oxidation state that a chemical species most commonly or primarily adopts when present in a given solution.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d6aa9ccddc8190868998c8b7beb060 completed April 8, 2026, 7:21 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69d7e887293081909830852000d533fa completed April 9, 2026, 5:57 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69d75cec26fc8190a5497d186306f935 completed April 9, 2026, 8:01 a.m.
Created at: April 8, 2026, 9:29 p.m.