Triple

T11163650
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Zimbabwean general election, 2005 E264103 entity
Predicate enabledConstitutionalAmendments P35321 FINISHED
Object yes LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: yes | Statement: [Zimbabwean general election, 2005, enabledConstitutionalAmendments, yes]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: enabledConstitutionalAmendments
Context triple: [Zimbabwean general election, 2005, enabledConstitutionalAmendments, yes]
  • A. canAmendConstitution
    Indicates that an entity has the authority or power to modify or revise a constitution.
  • B. constitutionalAmendmentInvolved chosen
    Indicates that a specific constitutional amendment is directly relevant to, affects, or is implicated in the described situation, case, or action.
  • C. majorAmendment
    Indicates that one entity makes a significant or substantial change to another entity, typically altering its core content, structure, or effect.
  • D. hasAmendments
    Indicates that one entity (such as a document, law, or agreement) includes or is associated with one or more modifications, changes, or additions made after its original creation.
  • E. laterConstitutionalAct
    Indicates that one constitutional act occurs after another in time, establishing a later legal or constitutional measure relative to a prior one.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d6aa9ccddc8190868998c8b7beb060 completed April 8, 2026, 7:21 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69d7e8832fe88190a74d81f9ed547baa completed April 9, 2026, 5:57 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69d75cec26fc8190a5497d186306f935 completed April 9, 2026, 8:01 a.m.
Created at: April 8, 2026, 9:29 p.m.