Triple

T11161207
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Navassa Island E264039 entity
Predicate legalCaseRelated P78583 FINISHED
Object Jones v. United States
Jones v. United States is an 1890 U.S. Supreme Court case that affirmed American sovereignty and the applicability of U.S. law over Navassa Island under the Guano Islands Act.
E909216 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (5 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Jones v. United States | Statement: [Navassa Island, legalCaseRelated, Jones v. United States]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Jones v. United States
Context triple: [Navassa Island, legalCaseRelated, Jones v. United States]
  • A. Yates v. United States
    Yates v. United States is a 1957 U.S. Supreme Court decision that significantly narrowed the application of the Smith Act by distinguishing between the advocacy of abstract doctrine and the advocacy of concrete action to overthrow the government.
  • B. Reynolds v. United States
    Reynolds v. United States is an 1879 U.S. Supreme Court case that established the distinction between protected religious belief and regulable religiously motivated conduct, holding that the Free Exercise Clause does not excuse individuals from compliance with otherwise valid criminal laws such as those banning polygamy.
  • C. Dennis v. United States
    Dennis v. United States is a landmark 1951 U.S. Supreme Court decision that upheld the convictions of Communist Party leaders under the Smith Act, significantly shaping First Amendment jurisprudence on speech advocating the overthrow of the government.
  • D. Wright v. United States
    Wright v. United States is a 1938 U.S. Supreme Court case that clarified the scope of presidential veto power and the constitutional requirements for lawmaking under the Presentment Clause.
  • E. Light v. United States
    Light v. United States is a 1911 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld broad federal authority to regulate and control the use of public lands, including grazing, under the Property Clause of the Constitution.
  • F. None of above. chosen
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NEDg Description generation gpt-5.1
Instruction
Generate a one-sentence description of the target entity. 
You are given a context triple in the form (subject, predicate, object), where the object is the target entity. 
# Instructions
Use the triple to infer relevant information about the entity. Describe the entity based on what is most defining, well-known. 
Avoid repeating the information from the triple, unless really essential.
# Response Format
Return only the sentence: "Description: [one-sentence description of the target entity]"
Input
Entity: Jones v. United States
Triple: [Navassa Island, legalCaseRelated, Jones v. United States]
Generated description
Jones v. United States is an 1890 U.S. Supreme Court case that affirmed American sovereignty and the applicability of U.S. law over Navassa Island under the Guano Islands Act.
NED2 Entity disambiguation (via description) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Jones v. United States
Target entity description: Jones v. United States is an 1890 U.S. Supreme Court case that affirmed American sovereignty and the applicability of U.S. law over Navassa Island under the Guano Islands Act.
  • A. Yates v. United States
    Yates v. United States is a 1957 U.S. Supreme Court decision that significantly narrowed the application of the Smith Act by distinguishing between the advocacy of abstract doctrine and the advocacy of concrete action to overthrow the government.
  • B. Reynolds v. United States
    Reynolds v. United States is an 1879 U.S. Supreme Court case that established the distinction between protected religious belief and regulable religiously motivated conduct, holding that the Free Exercise Clause does not excuse individuals from compliance with otherwise valid criminal laws such as those banning polygamy.
  • C. Dennis v. United States
    Dennis v. United States is a landmark 1951 U.S. Supreme Court decision that upheld the convictions of Communist Party leaders under the Smith Act, significantly shaping First Amendment jurisprudence on speech advocating the overthrow of the government.
  • D. Wright v. United States
    Wright v. United States is a 1938 U.S. Supreme Court case that clarified the scope of presidential veto power and the constitutional requirements for lawmaking under the Presentment Clause.
  • E. Light v. United States
    Light v. United States is a 1911 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld broad federal authority to regulate and control the use of public lands, including grazing, under the Property Clause of the Constitution.
  • F. None of above. chosen
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: legalCaseRelated
Context triple: [Navassa Island, legalCaseRelated, Jones v. United States]
  • A. legalCaseRelatedTo chosen
    Indicates that there is a relevant connection or association between a legal case and another entity, such as a person, organization, event, or legal matter.
  • B. legalCaseAlongside
    Indicates that two or more legal cases are proceeding in parallel or in coordination, such that they are related or handled together in some aspect of the legal process.
  • C. legalCase
    Indicates a relationship where a formal legal dispute or proceeding exists between parties, typically adjudicated by a court or similar authority.
  • D. legalRepresentation
    Indicates that one entity formally acts on behalf of another in legal matters, such as providing counsel, advocacy, or defense within a legal system.
  • E. legalMatters
    Indicates that one entity is involved with, concerned about, or responsible for legal issues, processes, or obligations related to another entity or context.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (6 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d6aa9ccddc8190868998c8b7beb060 completed April 8, 2026, 7:21 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69d7e8817a90819087820d5241c58851 completed April 9, 2026, 5:57 p.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_69e46375c61c8190939401f790cf1593 completed April 19, 2026, 5:09 a.m.
NEDg Description generation batch_69e46c374ca08190a876ee68dea9b821 completed April 19, 2026, 5:46 a.m.
NED2 Entity disambiguation (via description) batch_69e4747bc02c81908f0782cf85667f3f completed April 19, 2026, 6:21 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69d75cec26fc8190a5497d186306f935 completed April 9, 2026, 8:01 a.m.
Created at: April 8, 2026, 9:29 p.m.