Triple
T11161207
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Navassa Island |
E264039
|
entity |
| Predicate | legalCaseRelated |
P78583
|
FINISHED |
| Object |
Jones v. United States
Jones v. United States is an 1890 U.S. Supreme Court case that affirmed American sovereignty and the applicability of U.S. law over Navassa Island under the Guano Islands Act.
|
E909216
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (5 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Jones v. United States | Statement: [Navassa Island, legalCaseRelated, Jones v. United States]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Jones v. United States Context triple: [Navassa Island, legalCaseRelated, Jones v. United States]
-
A.
Yates v. United States
Yates v. United States is a 1957 U.S. Supreme Court decision that significantly narrowed the application of the Smith Act by distinguishing between the advocacy of abstract doctrine and the advocacy of concrete action to overthrow the government.
-
B.
Reynolds v. United States
Reynolds v. United States is an 1879 U.S. Supreme Court case that established the distinction between protected religious belief and regulable religiously motivated conduct, holding that the Free Exercise Clause does not excuse individuals from compliance with otherwise valid criminal laws such as those banning polygamy.
-
C.
Dennis v. United States
Dennis v. United States is a landmark 1951 U.S. Supreme Court decision that upheld the convictions of Communist Party leaders under the Smith Act, significantly shaping First Amendment jurisprudence on speech advocating the overthrow of the government.
-
D.
Wright v. United States
Wright v. United States is a 1938 U.S. Supreme Court case that clarified the scope of presidential veto power and the constitutional requirements for lawmaking under the Presentment Clause.
-
E.
Light v. United States
Light v. United States is a 1911 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld broad federal authority to regulate and control the use of public lands, including grazing, under the Property Clause of the Constitution.
- F. None of above. chosen
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NEDg
Description generation
gpt-5.1
Instruction
Generate a one-sentence description of the target entity. You are given a context triple in the form (subject, predicate, object), where the object is the target entity. # Instructions Use the triple to infer relevant information about the entity. Describe the entity based on what is most defining, well-known. Avoid repeating the information from the triple, unless really essential. # Response Format Return only the sentence: "Description: [one-sentence description of the target entity]"
Input
Entity: Jones v. United States Triple: [Navassa Island, legalCaseRelated, Jones v. United States]
Generated description
Jones v. United States is an 1890 U.S. Supreme Court case that affirmed American sovereignty and the applicability of U.S. law over Navassa Island under the Guano Islands Act.
NED2
Entity disambiguation (via description)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Jones v. United States Target entity description: Jones v. United States is an 1890 U.S. Supreme Court case that affirmed American sovereignty and the applicability of U.S. law over Navassa Island under the Guano Islands Act.
-
A.
Yates v. United States
Yates v. United States is a 1957 U.S. Supreme Court decision that significantly narrowed the application of the Smith Act by distinguishing between the advocacy of abstract doctrine and the advocacy of concrete action to overthrow the government.
-
B.
Reynolds v. United States
Reynolds v. United States is an 1879 U.S. Supreme Court case that established the distinction between protected religious belief and regulable religiously motivated conduct, holding that the Free Exercise Clause does not excuse individuals from compliance with otherwise valid criminal laws such as those banning polygamy.
-
C.
Dennis v. United States
Dennis v. United States is a landmark 1951 U.S. Supreme Court decision that upheld the convictions of Communist Party leaders under the Smith Act, significantly shaping First Amendment jurisprudence on speech advocating the overthrow of the government.
-
D.
Wright v. United States
Wright v. United States is a 1938 U.S. Supreme Court case that clarified the scope of presidential veto power and the constitutional requirements for lawmaking under the Presentment Clause.
-
E.
Light v. United States
Light v. United States is a 1911 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld broad federal authority to regulate and control the use of public lands, including grazing, under the Property Clause of the Constitution.
- F. None of above. chosen
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: legalCaseRelated Context triple: [Navassa Island, legalCaseRelated, Jones v. United States]
-
A.
legalCaseRelatedTo
chosen
Indicates that there is a relevant connection or association between a legal case and another entity, such as a person, organization, event, or legal matter.
-
B.
legalCaseAlongside
Indicates that two or more legal cases are proceeding in parallel or in coordination, such that they are related or handled together in some aspect of the legal process.
-
C.
legalCase
Indicates a relationship where a formal legal dispute or proceeding exists between parties, typically adjudicated by a court or similar authority.
-
D.
legalRepresentation
Indicates that one entity formally acts on behalf of another in legal matters, such as providing counsel, advocacy, or defense within a legal system.
-
E.
legalMatters
Indicates that one entity is involved with, concerned about, or responsible for legal issues, processes, or obligations related to another entity or context.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (6 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d6aa9ccddc8190868998c8b7beb060 |
completed | April 8, 2026, 7:21 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69d7e8817a90819087820d5241c58851 |
completed | April 9, 2026, 5:57 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69e46375c61c8190939401f790cf1593 |
completed | April 19, 2026, 5:09 a.m. |
| NEDg | Description generation | batch_69e46c374ca08190a876ee68dea9b821 |
completed | April 19, 2026, 5:46 a.m. |
| NED2 | Entity disambiguation (via description) | batch_69e4747bc02c81908f0782cf85667f3f |
completed | April 19, 2026, 6:21 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69d75cec26fc8190a5497d186306f935 |
completed | April 9, 2026, 8:01 a.m. |
Created at: April 8, 2026, 9:29 p.m.