Triple
T11159459
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Oakes test |
E263994
|
entity |
| Predicate | alsoKnownAs |
P39
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Oakes proportionality test |
E263994
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Oakes proportionality test | Statement: [Oakes test, alsoKnownAs, Oakes proportionality test]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Oakes proportionality test Context triple: [Oakes test, alsoKnownAs, Oakes proportionality test]
-
A.
Oakes test
chosen
The Oakes test is a legal framework used by Canadian courts to determine whether a law that limits Charter rights can be justified as a reasonable and demonstrably justified restriction in a free and democratic society.
-
B.
Strickland v. Washington
Strickland v. Washington is a landmark 1984 U.S. Supreme Court case that established the two-pronged test for determining when a criminal defendant’s right to effective assistance of counsel has been violated.
-
C.
Lemon test
The Lemon test is a three-pronged legal standard used by U.S. courts to determine whether a government action violates the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment.
-
D.
Batson v. Kentucky
Batson v. Kentucky is a landmark 1986 U.S. Supreme Court case that held prosecutors may not use peremptory challenges to exclude jurors solely on the basis of race, reshaping jury selection practices nationwide.
-
E.
Jacobellis v. Ohio
Jacobellis v. Ohio is a 1964 U.S. Supreme Court decision that refined the constitutional standards for obscenity under the First Amendment, famously associated with Justice Potter Stewart’s “I know it when I see it” concurrence.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d6aa9ccddc8190868998c8b7beb060 |
completed | April 8, 2026, 7:21 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69d7e8817a90819087820d5241c58851 |
completed | April 9, 2026, 5:57 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69e4636268d0819088873f2062115506 |
completed | April 19, 2026, 5:08 a.m. |
Created at: April 8, 2026, 9:28 p.m.