Triple

T11159436
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Oakes test E263994 entity
Predicate secondStep P50952 FINISHED
Object determine whether there is a rational connection between the law and its objective LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: determine whether there is a rational connection between the law and its objective | Statement: [Oakes test, secondStep, determine whether there is a rational connection between the law and its objective]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: secondStep
Context triple: [Oakes test, secondStep, determine whether there is a rational connection between the law and its objective]
  • A. secondStage
    Indicates that something functions as the subsequent or follow-up stage in a multi-stage process or sequence.
  • B. secondPhase
    Indicates that an entity is in, or has progressed to, the second phase or stage of a multi-phase process or sequence.
  • C. secondStageType
    Indicates the specific kind or category of a process, object, or event that occurs as the second stage in a multi-stage sequence.
  • D. secondElement
    Indicates that one entity is the second element in an ordered pair, sequence, or collection relative to another entity.
  • E. secondStageDescription chosen
    Indicates that the predicate provides a textual explanation or details about the second stage of a multi-stage process or sequence.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d6aa9ccddc8190868998c8b7beb060 completed April 8, 2026, 7:21 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69d7e8817a90819087820d5241c58851 completed April 9, 2026, 5:57 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69d75cec26fc8190a5497d186306f935 completed April 9, 2026, 8:01 a.m.
Created at: April 8, 2026, 9:28 p.m.