Triple

T11159339
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Reference re Senate Reform E263992 entity
Predicate isAdvisoryOpinion P98160 FINISHED
Object true LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: true | Statement: [Reference re Senate Reform, isAdvisoryOpinion, true]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: isAdvisoryOpinion
Context triple: [Reference re Senate Reform, isAdvisoryOpinion, true]
  • A. hasAdvisoryJurisdictionUnder
    Indicates that an authority or body holds the legal power to issue non-binding opinions or recommendations under a specified law, treaty, or framework.
  • B. hasAdvisoryJurisdiction
    Indicates that an authority or body has the power to issue non-binding legal or expert opinions or recommendations on certain matters.
  • C. givesLegalOpinionTo
    Indicates that one party provides a formal legal judgment, advice, or interpretation to another party.
  • D. isDiscretionary
    Indicates that the action or decision is optional and left to personal or organizational judgment rather than being mandatory or automatic.
  • E. hasMajorityOpinionBy
    Indicates that a majority of the relevant group or decision-making body holds or supports the opinion expressed by the referenced entity.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d6aa9ccddc8190868998c8b7beb060 completed April 8, 2026, 7:21 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69d7e87fe9a881909540ecc4ed9b6b9f completed April 9, 2026, 5:57 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69d75cec26fc8190a5497d186306f935 completed April 9, 2026, 8:01 a.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69d7706116248190a87440bec3960884 completed April 9, 2026, 9:24 a.m.
Created at: April 8, 2026, 9:28 p.m.