Triple
T11134386
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Mahabad |
E263372
|
entity |
| Predicate | locatedIn |
P40
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Mahabad County |
E907904
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Mahabad County | Statement: [Mahabad, locatedIn, Mahabad County]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Mahabad County Context triple: [Mahabad, locatedIn, Mahabad County]
-
A.
Mahabad County
chosen
Mahabad County is an administrative division in Iran’s West Azerbaijan Province, centered on the city of Mahabad and known for its predominantly Kurdish population.
-
B.
Pakdasht County
Pakdasht County is an administrative subdivision in Iran located southeast of Tehran, known for its agricultural activities and proximity to the capital.
-
C.
Islamshahr County
Islamshahr County is an administrative subdivision in north-central Iran that forms part of the greater Tehran metropolitan area.
-
D.
Nahavand County
Nahavand County is an administrative division in western Iran known for its historical significance and agricultural activities within Hamedan Province.
-
E.
Pishva County
Pishva County is an administrative subdivision in northern Iran known for its location within Tehran Province and its proximity to the capital city.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d6aa9c0ba08190bbd19c217489b755 |
completed | April 8, 2026, 7:21 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69d7e85daddc8190a1ae2a4a75cc8d50 |
completed | April 9, 2026, 5:56 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69e46308d2f481908827d0d569802f89 |
completed | April 19, 2026, 5:07 a.m. |
Created at: April 8, 2026, 9:28 p.m.