Triple
T11101394
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Louisville Bats |
E262512
|
entity |
| Predicate | playsWithinSystem |
P25330
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Cincinnati Reds farm system |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Cincinnati Reds farm system | Statement: [Louisville Bats, playsWithinSystem, Cincinnati Reds farm system]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: playsWithinSystem Context triple: [Louisville Bats, playsWithinSystem, Cincinnati Reds farm system]
-
A.
playsInSystem
chosen
Indicates that an entity participates or operates within a particular system or framework.
-
B.
playsOn
Indicates that one entity participates or performs on a particular team, platform, or medium.
-
C.
tookPlaceInSystem
Indicates that an event or process occurred within, or was hosted by, a particular system or environment.
-
D.
playableWith
Indicates that one entity can be used, engaged, or interacted with together alongside another entity, typically in a compatible or cooperative manner.
-
E.
playsOnSurface
Indicates that an entity performs or engages in an activity while being in contact with or supported by a particular surface.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d6aa9a40d88190a373e2c7e48285db |
completed | April 8, 2026, 7:20 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69d79a2ab09081908ffce2df8912b657 |
completed | April 9, 2026, 12:23 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69d7441aa3548190b92dbde57841c135 |
completed | April 9, 2026, 6:15 a.m. |
Created at: April 8, 2026, 9:27 p.m.