Triple

T11100663
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Crusoe E262493 entity
Predicate advantageClaimed P16215 FINISHED
Object lower power usage than contemporary x86 CPUs LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: lower power usage than contemporary x86 CPUs | Statement: [Crusoe, advantageClaimed, lower power usage than contemporary x86 CPUs]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: advantageClaimed
Context triple: [Crusoe, advantageClaimed, lower power usage than contemporary x86 CPUs]
  • A. claimedFor
    Indicates that one entity has asserted ownership, responsibility, or entitlement over or on behalf of another entity.
  • B. claimedAs
    Indicates that one entity asserts ownership, authorship, responsibility, or some other form of association over another entity.
  • C. usedToClaim
    Indicates that something is employed as evidence, justification, or support in making a particular claim.
  • D. alsoClaimedBy
    Indicates that the same item, statement, or resource is asserted or claimed by an additional party besides the primary one.
  • E. claimed chosen
    Indicates that an entity has asserted or stated something as true, often without definitive proof or verification.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d6aa9a40d88190a373e2c7e48285db completed April 8, 2026, 7:20 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69d79a29ee6c819092bc0da3f9255389 completed April 9, 2026, 12:23 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69d7441aa3548190b92dbde57841c135 completed April 9, 2026, 6:15 a.m.
Created at: April 8, 2026, 9:27 p.m.