Triple

T11098614
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject PSL(2,7) E262442 entity
Predicate hasSubgroupIsomorphicTo P97230 FINISHED
Object S_4 LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: S_4 | Statement: [PSL(2,7), hasSubgroupIsomorphicTo, S_4]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasSubgroupIsomorphicTo
Context triple: [PSL(2,7), hasSubgroupIsomorphicTo, S_4]
  • A. isMaximalSubgroupOf
    Indicates that one group is a proper subgroup of another that is not contained in any larger proper subgroup of that group.
  • B. isClosedSubgroupOf
    Indicates that one group is a subgroup of another and is closed in the topological sense within that larger group.
  • C. hasOrientationPreservingSubgroupNotation
    Indicates that a notation is used to represent a subgroup that preserves orientation within a larger structure or group.
  • D. hasNormalSubgroup
    Indicates that one group is a normal subgroup of another group, meaning it is invariant under conjugation by elements of the larger group.
  • E. hasHomomorphism
    Indicates that there exists a structure-preserving map (homomorphism) from one mathematical structure to another.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d6aa9a40d88190a373e2c7e48285db completed April 8, 2026, 7:20 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69d79a0b2890819081c4efc50e995cdd completed April 9, 2026, 12:22 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69d7441aa3548190b92dbde57841c135 completed April 9, 2026, 6:15 a.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69d750ca52ec8190a559432a5de106fd completed April 9, 2026, 7:10 a.m.
Created at: April 8, 2026, 9:27 p.m.