Triple
T1109795
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Find New Roads |
E25567
|
entity |
| Predicate | communicatesBrandValues |
P13747
|
FINISHED |
| Object | innovation |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: innovation | Statement: [Find New Roads, communicatesBrandValues, innovation]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: communicatesBrandValues Context triple: [Find New Roads, communicatesBrandValues, innovation]
-
A.
brandFocus
Indicates that a brand primarily concentrates its efforts, messaging, or resources on a particular target, theme, or market segment.
-
B.
brandPositioning
Indicates how a brand is strategically placed and perceived in the minds of its target audience relative to competitors.
-
C.
brandingFeature
Indicates that one entity serves as a branding-related characteristic, element, or attribute that helps define or distinguish another entity’s brand identity.
-
D.
brandingMeaning
chosen
Indicates the conceptual message, values, or identity that a brand is intended to convey or represent.
-
E.
brandingIntroduced
Indicates that a particular branding or brand identity has been newly introduced or brought into use for an entity.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a49428d4448190b3b36991ceae87ce |
completed | March 1, 2026, 7:31 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a4ba045fd88190982e1c6278fb9ca3 |
completed | March 1, 2026, 10:13 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a4b749e2a881909ef28745a7d2d917 |
completed | March 1, 2026, 10:01 p.m. |
Created at: March 1, 2026, 7:43 p.m.