Triple
T11096779
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Internal Security Fund |
E262397
|
entity |
| Predicate | partOfPolicyArea |
P26131
|
FINISHED |
| Object | European Union area of freedom, security and justice |
E48490
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (3 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: European Union area of freedom, security and justice | Statement: [Internal Security Fund, partOfPolicyArea, European Union area of freedom, security and justice]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: European Union area of freedom, security and justice Context triple: [Internal Security Fund, partOfPolicyArea, European Union area of freedom, security and justice]
-
A.
European Union area of freedom, security and justice
chosen
The European Union area of freedom, security and justice is a policy and legal framework that aims to ensure free movement while coordinating member states’ cooperation on immigration, asylum, border control, police, and judicial matters.
-
B.
European Union Agency for the Operational Management of Large-Scale IT Systems in the Area of Freedom, Security and Justice
The European Union Agency for the Operational Management of Large-Scale IT Systems in the Area of Freedom, Security and Justice (eu-LISA) is an EU agency responsible for operating and developing key information systems that support border management, security, and justice cooperation across member states.
-
C.
Justice and Home Affairs pillar
The Justice and Home Affairs pillar was a key component of the European Union’s pre-Lisbon structure that coordinated intergovernmental cooperation on issues such as immigration, asylum, policing, and judicial matters.
-
D.
Schengen Area
The Schengen Area is a zone of European countries that have abolished internal border controls to allow passport-free movement of people across most of the continent.
-
E.
European Union Justice and Home Affairs agencies network
The European Union Justice and Home Affairs agencies network is a collaborative framework that brings together EU agencies working on justice, security, migration, and fundamental rights to coordinate policies and operational cooperation across member states.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: partOfPolicyArea Context triple: [Internal Security Fund, partOfPolicyArea, European Union area of freedom, security and justice]
-
A.
isPartOfPolicyArea
chosen
Indicates that one policy, topic, or issue belongs to, falls under, or is categorized within a broader policy area or domain.
-
B.
commonPolicyArea
Indicates that two entities share the same policy domain, topic, or area of regulatory or legislative focus.
-
C.
coversPolicyArea
Indicates that a policy, document, or initiative includes or addresses a particular policy area or topic within its scope.
-
D.
policyAreaScope
Indicates the specific policy domain or thematic area to which an action, decision, or measure is relevant or applies.
-
E.
supportsPolicyArea
Indicates that one entity endorses, advocates for, or is in favor of a particular policy area or domain of public policy.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d6aa9a40d88190a373e2c7e48285db |
completed | April 8, 2026, 7:20 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69d79a0a02cc8190a15df663d4860163 |
completed | April 9, 2026, 12:22 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69e441bb14d08190ac01bf3daa34ae43 |
completed | April 19, 2026, 2:45 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69d7441aa3548190b92dbde57841c135 |
completed | April 9, 2026, 6:15 a.m. |
Created at: April 8, 2026, 9:27 p.m.