Triple
T11095854
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Australian administration of Nauru |
E262374
|
entity |
| Predicate | introducedLegalSystemModeledOn |
P16986
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Australian common law |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Australian common law | Statement: [Australian administration of Nauru, introducedLegalSystemModeledOn, Australian common law]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: introducedLegalSystemModeledOn Context triple: [Australian administration of Nauru, introducedLegalSystemModeledOn, Australian common law]
-
A.
countryOfLegalSystem
Indicates the relationship between a legal system and the country in which that legal system is officially established or applied.
-
B.
partOfLegalSystem
Indicates that something belongs to, is included within, or functions as a component of a particular legal system.
-
C.
hasExtendedLawSystem
Indicates that an entity possesses a comprehensive, detailed, and well-developed system of laws or legal regulations.
-
D.
relatedLegalSystem
chosen
Indicates that there is an association or connection between two legal systems, such as influence, similarity, shared origin, or mutual relevance.
-
E.
legalSystemDepictedAs
Indicates that one entity portrays, represents, or characterizes a legal system in a particular way or form.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d6aa9a40d88190a373e2c7e48285db |
completed | April 8, 2026, 7:20 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69d79a0897188190b6c293b44990b3d4 |
completed | April 9, 2026, 12:22 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69d7441aa3548190b92dbde57841c135 |
completed | April 9, 2026, 6:15 a.m. |
Created at: April 8, 2026, 9:27 p.m.