Triple

T1108887
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Leaping Lena E25546 entity
Predicate appliedToTechnology P1485 FINISHED
Object internal combustion engine car LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: internal combustion engine car | Statement: [Leaping Lena, appliedToTechnology, internal combustion engine car]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: appliedToTechnology
Context triple: [Leaping Lena, appliedToTechnology, internal combustion engine car]
  • A. associatedWithTechnology chosen
    Indicates a relationship where an entity is connected to, involved with, or utilizes a particular technology.
  • B. appliesTo
    Indicates that something is relevant, valid, or has effect in relation to a particular entity, case, or context.
  • C. offeredTechnology
    Indicates that one entity has provided or proposed a specific technology to another entity as an option for use, adoption, or consideration.
  • D. appliesToFeature
    Indicates that something (such as a rule, constraint, or configuration) is relevant to, or governs, a specific feature.
  • E. technologicalFeature
    Indicates that one entity possesses, exhibits, or is characterized by a specific technological capability, component, or functionality in relation to another entity.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69a49428d4448190b3b36991ceae87ce completed March 1, 2026, 7:31 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69a4b9e6134481909f348986a25f65c6 completed March 1, 2026, 10:12 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69a4b749e2a881909ef28745a7d2d917 completed March 1, 2026, 10:01 p.m.
Created at: March 1, 2026, 7:43 p.m.