Triple

T11085584
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Ministers’ Deputies E262110 entity
Predicate hasSubStructure P19432 FINISHED
Object rapporteur groups LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: rapporteur groups | Statement: [Ministers’ Deputies, hasSubStructure, rapporteur groups]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasSubStructure
Context triple: [Ministers’ Deputies, hasSubStructure, rapporteur groups]
  • A. containsAsSubstructure chosen
    Indicates that one structure includes another structure entirely within it as a component or embedded part.
  • B. hasStructureAbove
    Indicates that one entity has another entity positioned vertically higher or located on top of it within a structural or spatial arrangement.
  • C. containsStructureFrom
    Indicates that one entity includes or incorporates a structural component originating from another entity.
  • D. hasSubset
    Indicates that one set is entirely contained within another set, with all elements of the first set also belonging to the second.
  • E. hasSubcomponent
    Indicates that one entity is a constituent part or component of another, larger entity.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d6aa9983c08190b0ef61603b69feac completed April 8, 2026, 7:20 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69d799c2c7d4819087ac793153340178 completed April 9, 2026, 12:21 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69d744185a5881909ba4cf151d1798ec completed April 9, 2026, 6:15 a.m.
Created at: April 8, 2026, 9:27 p.m.