Triple

T11085062
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject political question doctrine E262097 entity
Predicate leadingCase P82359 FINISHED
Object Zivotofsky v. Kerry E903976 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Zivotofsky v. Kerry | Statement: [political question doctrine, leadingCase, Zivotofsky v. Kerry]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07 
Target entity: Zivotofsky v. Kerry
Context triple: [political question doctrine, leadingCase, Zivotofsky v. Kerry]
  • A. Zivotofsky v. Clinton chosen
    Zivotofsky v. Clinton is a 2012 U.S. Supreme Court case that limited the scope of the political question doctrine by allowing courts to review a dispute over the recognition of Jerusalem in U.S. passports.
  • B. Chiafalo v. Washington
    Chiafalo v. Washington is a 2020 U.S. Supreme Court case that unanimously upheld states’ authority to penalize or replace “faithless electors” who do not vote in line with their state’s popular vote in presidential elections.
  • C. INS v. Chadha
    INS v. Chadha is a landmark 1983 U.S. Supreme Court case that struck down the legislative veto as unconstitutional, significantly reshaping the balance of power between Congress and the executive branch.
  • D. Hamdi v. Rumsfeld
    Hamdi v. Rumsfeld is a 2004 U.S. Supreme Court case that held American citizens designated as enemy combatants have the right to challenge their detention before a neutral decision-maker.
  • E. Cantwell v. Connecticut
    Cantwell v. Connecticut is a 1940 U.S. Supreme Court case that first applied the First Amendment’s Free Exercise Clause to the states, striking down a state law that improperly restricted religious proselytizing.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d6aa9983c08190b0ef61603b69feac completed April 8, 2026, 7:20 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69d799c2c7d4819087ac793153340178 completed April 9, 2026, 12:21 p.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_69e42d66ded88190877a20a10f012d6b completed April 19, 2026, 1:18 a.m.
Created at: April 8, 2026, 9:27 p.m.