Triple

T11083271
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Jan Masaryk E262053 entity
Predicate hasCauseOfDeathInvestigation P97119 FINISHED
Object suspected murder LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: suspected murder | Statement: [Jan Masaryk, hasCauseOfDeathInvestigation, suspected murder]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasCauseOfDeathInvestigation
Context triple: [Jan Masaryk, hasCauseOfDeathInvestigation, suspected murder]
  • A. hasMannerOfDeath
    Indicates the specific way or circumstances in which an entity died, such as natural causes, accident, homicide, or suicide.
  • B. areInvestigatedFor
    Indicates that one or more entities are the subject of an investigation concerning a particular issue, incident, or alleged wrongdoing.
  • C. hasMannerOfDeathOfVictim
    Indicates the specific way or circumstances in which the victim died in relation to the event or action being described.
  • D. allegedMannerOfDeath
    Indicates that the specified manner of death is claimed or reported for an entity, but not confirmed as factual.
  • E. hasSubjectDeathEvent
    Indicates that an entity is associated with an event representing the death of its subject.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d6aa9983c08190b0ef61603b69feac completed April 8, 2026, 7:20 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69d799bf89f48190889f08d2f5dd220a completed April 9, 2026, 12:21 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69d744185a5881909ba4cf151d1798ec completed April 9, 2026, 6:15 a.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69d750ca52ec8190a559432a5de106fd completed April 9, 2026, 7:10 a.m.
Created at: April 8, 2026, 9:27 p.m.